United States v. DeMURO

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that exclusion of duplicative evidence is well within the discretion of a trial judge
• holding evidentiary “error was harmless” when the evidence against the defendant “was substantial” and the excluded evidence “was of minimal probative value”
• including “a mother/daughter relationship and a babysitter/child relationship” as well as a parishioner/church advisor relationship (citations omitted)
• “An error that was not objected to at trial is reviewed for plain error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).