United States v. Demetric Wade

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding “scant evidence” to support finding of foreseeability as to co-conspirator’s gun possession where defendant was “retail dealer” in $1,100 sale of crack
• “We are willing to infer that a coconspirator’s firearm possession is foreseeable based sole[ly] on the quantity of drugs involved only when the quantity of drugs at issue is so large that the participants would expect others to be carrying protection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).