United States v. Delossantos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The fact that an innocent explanation may be consistent with the facts alleged does not negate probable cause.” (Citation and punctuation omitted)
• “The fact that an innocent explanation may be consistent with the facts alleged does not negate probable cause.” (Citation and punctuation omitted)
• “[W]e cannot discount facts one by one simply because [the defendant] has suggested hypothetical explanations for them that are consistent with his innocence.”
• “Whereas Di Re was merely seen sitting in the suspect’s vehicle when officers approached, the agents here saw [a co-defendant] ferry Delossantos between the likely drug-stash location and the transaction point and heard Delossantos discuss details of the transaction.”
• making observation in context of assessing probable cause
• making observation in context of assessing probable cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).