United States v. Delgado Reyes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 9(b) was not satisfied because, inter 21 alia, plaintiff did not “identify the [defendant's] employees who performed the tests, 22 or provide any dates, times, or places the tests were conducted”
• remanding because sentencing judge “seemed inclined” to accept joint stipulation that lower range applied
• “The cases in which courts have afforded relief have 21 involved delays of years not months,” listing examples of delay between 4–10 years 22 as unreasonable delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).