United States v. Delgado-Marrero

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, in context, plain error standard was met even though government argued that special jury verdict and accompanying instructions cured the instructional defect arising from the omission of the reasonable doubt requirement for an element of the offense
• finding Alleyne error where instructions, viewed as a whole, did not explain that the jury needed to find drug quantity beyond a reasonable doubt
• listing “other available assistance” to the movant as a factor to be considered in determining whether a district court abused its discretion in denying a motion for a continuance
• stating that the error must be “clear or obvious”
• stating that the error must be \clear or obvious\
• listing \other available assistance\ to the movant as a factor to be considered in determining whether a district court abused its discretion in denying a motion for a continuance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).