United States v. Delgado-Hernandez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the claimant “failed to meet his burden of establishing 26 disability” where “none of the medical opinions included a finding of impairment, a diagnosis, or 27 objective test results”
• finding that the claimant “failed to meet his burden of establishing 28 1 disability” where “none of the medical opinions included a finding of impairment, a diagnosis, or 2 objective test results”
• applying plain error analysis where defendant argued there was no factual basis to support his guilty plea
• applying plain-error review where the defendant had \ample opportunity\ to object prior to the sentence's imposition (quoting United States v. Negrón-Narváez, 403 F.3d 33, 37 (1st Cir. 2005))
• “‘[E]nsuring that the defendant understands the elements of the charges that the prosecution would have to prove at trial’ is ... ‘a “core concern” of Rule 11.’ ” (first alteration in original) (quoting United States v. Gandia-Maysonet, 227 F.3d 1, 3 (1st Cir. 2000))
• finding claimant offered no objective medical evidence in support 22 of claim that medically determinable impairments were severe

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).