Skip to main content
· 7/12/2005

United States v. Delacruz-Soto

Citations

  • 414 F.3d 1158
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 13987
  • 2005 WL 1625226

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Anders allows an attorney withdraw after, inter alia, filing a brief that cites \those portions of the record that arguably support the appeal\
  • observing that after counsel filed Anders brief, defendant submitted a pro se letter raising an ineffective assistance of counsel argument not addressed by his counsel’s Anders brief, and finding counsel’s submission adequate and granting motion to withdraw
  • observing that after counsel filed Anders brief, defendant submitted a pro se letter raising an ineffective assistance of counsel argument not addressed by his counsel’s Anders brief, and finding counsel’s submission adequate and granting motion to withdraw
  • declining, in considering an Anders brief, to consider an ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ebel, Murphy, McConnell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.