United States v. Dekle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that multiple transactions which “revealed nothing more than isolated purchases for personal consumption” do not support a conspiracy conviction
• explaining that “the existence of a simple buyer-seller relationship alone does not furnish the requisite evidence of a conspiratorial agreement”
• determining evidence that a doctor issued at least 129 prescriptions for controlled substances to 4 women in exchange for sexual acts or nude photographs was insufficient to establish a conspiracy to distribute controlled substances
• “This joint objective is missing where the conspiracy is based on an agreement between a buyer and a seller for the sale of drugs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).