Skip to main content
· 7/28/1988

United States v. Degollado

Citations

  • 696 F. Supp. 1136
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10488
  • 1988 WL 103661

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • wherein the court stated that securing evidence through the use of an electrical prod and seltzer water warranted its suppression
  • wherein the court stated that securing evidence through the use of an electrical prod and seltzer water warranted its suppression
  • wherein the court stated that securing evidence through the use of an electrical prod and seltzer water warranted its suppression
  • wherein the court stated that securing evidence through the use of an electrical prod and seltzer water warranted its suppression

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kazen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.