Skip to main content
· 6/24/2011

United States v. Degaule

Citations

  • 797 F. Supp. 2d 1332
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67983
  • 2011 WL 2518803

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting conclusory argument that agent who obtained wiretap orders misled the issuing judges
  • asking In any event, because the post-arrest “Do I call my attorney now?” at end of statement was not presented at trial, any error interview was insufficient to invoke right to was harmless. See, e.g., Gordon v. Mantello, counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard W. Story

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.