Skip to main content
· 5/6/2010

United States v. Defreitas

Citations

  • 701 F. Supp. 2d 309
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44334
  • 2010 WL 1850950

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that the court would further instruct the jury that the statements may not be considered to prove the non-declarant’s membership in any of the conspiracies or the non-declar-ant’s intent to achieve any of the conspiracies’ objectives
  • “[T]he contention that a Bruton analysis is different when applied to a conspiracy charged against all defendants is baseless in light of [Second Circuit precedent].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dora L. Irizarry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.