Skip to main content
· 12/23/1992

United States v. Debra Alessandroni

Citations

  • 982 F.2d 419
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 33387
  • 1992 WL 379801

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court properly used the against a defendant who fails a drug test. defendant’s prior conviction as the predicate felony under § 922(g)(1
  • holding it is not the conduct of committing a prior felony that is an element of being a felon in possession of a firearm, rather it is the status of being a convicted felon
  • upholding, against a similar challenge premised on 4A1.2(a)(1), the district court's consideration of a prior burglary conviction in calculating both the base offense level and the CHC applicable to a pending felon-in-possession count
  • reviewing for plain error a defendant’s claim that the district court had erroneously applied the Guidelines’ criminal-history provisions and noting that “the imposition of a sentence based on an erroneous interpretation of the law constitutes plain error” (citation omitted)
  • reviewing for plain error a defendant’s claim that the district court had erroneously applied the Guidelines’ criminal-history provisions and noting that “the imposition of a sentence based on an erroneous interpretation of the law constitutes plain error” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Logan, Barrett, Ebel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.