United States v. Deborah Ann Stoudenmire

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the day of the event that triggers the clock is not included in the calculation; “the clock begins to run the following day”
• observing that STA clock runs from date after triggering event
• determining that period during continuance order, granted for reasons that amounted to docket congestion, was not properly excludable from period under Speedy Trial Act, even though the order purported to exclude this period under the ends-of-justice exclusion
• excluding period from the day the motion is filed through the day the district court holds a hearing on the motion for purposes of determin- ing statutorily mandated period
• “Because the defendant made her initial appearance prior to her indictment, . . . the day of her indictment . . . triggers the [Speedy Trial Act] clock.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).