United States v. De Nova

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• permitting the appointment of a substitute arbitrator under the FAA pursuant to a similar agreement
• permitting the appointment of a substitute arbitrator under the FAA pursuant to a similar agreement
• noting the lack of evidence that “the ‘exclusive’ designation of the NAF was an important consideration to ... [the plaintiff]” and that the record did not indicate “[the plaintiff] was even aware of the NAF (or its Code) when he signed the Arbitration Agreement”
• noting the lack of evidence that “the ‘exclusive’ designation of the NAF was an important consideration to . . . [the plaintiff]” and that the record did not indicate “[the plaintiff] was even aware of the NAF (or its Code) when he signed the Arbitration Agreement”
• \all claims .. . shall be resolved exclusively by binding arbitration . . . in accordance with the National Arbitration Forum [Rules] of Procedure\
• “On its face, this provision does not mandate that the NAF actually conduct the arbitration — it requires only that the NAF Code be applied by the arbitrator.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).