· 5/21/1928
United States v. De Messimy
Citations
- 16 Ct. Cust. 150
- 1928 WL 28034
- 1928 CCPA LEXIS 55
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring that plain error be \ 'clear under current law' at the time of trial\
- stating that first element of analysis requires that there he error
- explaining error affects substantial rights if it affects the outcome of the proceeding
- “Olano counsels that in most cases the affecting of substantial rights requires that the error be prejudicial; it must affect the outcome of the proceeding.”
- “[A]n appellate court is empowered, in its discretion, to correct the assigned error.”
- forfeited errors corrected on appeal only if, inter alia, “clear” or “obvious”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baebeb, Barber, Bland, Graham, Hatfield, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.