Skip to main content
· 5/21/1928

United States v. De Messimy

Citations

  • 16 Ct. Cust. 150
  • 1928 WL 28034
  • 1928 CCPA LEXIS 55

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring that plain error be \ 'clear under current law' at the time of trial\
  • stating that first element of analysis requires that there he error
  • explaining error affects substantial rights if it affects the outcome of the proceeding
  • “Olano counsels that in most cases the affecting of substantial rights requires that the error be prejudicial; it must affect the outcome of the proceeding.”
  • “[A]n appellate court is empowered, in its discretion, to correct the assigned error.”
  • forfeited errors corrected on appeal only if, inter alia, “clear” or “obvious”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baebeb, Barber, Bland, Graham, Hatfield, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.