United States v. de la Puente

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \failure to comply with the APA's notice-and-comment requirements is unquestionably a 'serious' deficiency\
• noting that “failure to comply with the APA’s notice-and-comment requirements is unquestionably a ‘serious’ deficiency”
• stating that “failure to comply with the APA’s notice-and-comment requirements is unquestionably a ‘serious’ deficiency” in the rulemaking process that justifies vacatur
• describing procedural requirements such as notice-and- comment as “serv[ing] the salutary purposes of (1) ‘ensur[ing] that agency regulations are tested via exposure to diverse public comment, (2) ensur[ing] fairness to affected parties, and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).