Skip to main content
· 8/5/2010

United States v. de Jesús

Citations

  • 731 F. Supp. 2d 191

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because specific intent to deceive is not the only or single most reasonable inference to be drawn from the disclosure of voluminous references to the PTO, Qualcomm’s pleading of the ‘burying’ theory fails as a matter of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arenas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.