Skip to main content
· 2/16/1973

United States v. De Champlain

Citations

  • 22 C.M.A. 150

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that, despite an opinion’s vacatur, its reasoning may still “remain[] valid”
  • the United States Court of Claims is without jurisdiction to review Rehabilitation Act claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Darden, Duncan, Quinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.