United States v. Davis, Mark Stephen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[.Edmond ] more than suggests that if the ‘primary purpose’ had been- for a purpose the Court had already endorsed — such as detecting drunk drivers, or checking licenses — the roadblock would be constitutional.”
• “[Statistical evidence is not ... essential.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).