United States v. Davis, Horace L.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidentiary exclusion harmless because, “during the cross-examination of [the witness] the jury heard word-for-word what he said at the suppression hearing” and therefore the court’s refusal to admit the transcript “in no way prejudiced [defendant] or impaired his defense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).