Skip to main content
· 9/8/1998

United States v. David Yazzie Jones, Jr.

Citations

  • 158 F.3d 492
  • 1998 Colo. J. C.A.R. 4783
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 21891
  • 1998 WL 574208

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that appellate review \is at its most deferential\ when the court of appeals is evaluating \the district court's conclusion that the facts of this case made it atypical\
  • recognizing that, although the defendant’s support in the community was insufficiently “extraordinary” to support a departure on this basis alone, a district court did not abuse its discretion by relying on this factor as one of several grounds supporting a departure
  • stating that appellate review \is at its most defer ential\ when the court of appeals is evaluating \the district court's conclusion that the facts of this case made it atypical\
  • upholding the district court’s finding that the Defendant’s conduct was aberrational when he “basically had been law-abiding until age 35, when his marriage disintegrated”
  • considering “the negative effect incarceration would have on both the quality and quantity of [defendant’s] rehabilitative counseling”
  • disapproving use of the discouraged factor of family responsibilities, but affirming downward departure on the basis of other supporting factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brorby, Holloway, Ebel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.