United States v. David W. Judd, Robert N. Puett, Sage Poodry, and Jerry Dean Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• two offices were in the same building complex and “the door to 9170 was only 25 to 30 feet away from the door to 9172-B”
• “[Supreme Court precedent] is read much too broadly when it is claimed to require that mail and wire fraud convictions can be sustained only if motivated by intent to cause financial loss to another.”
• corporate filings showed only one address

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).