United States v. David Sternstein, A/K/A David Stevens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant argued that he charged flat fee not contingent on refund, but government argued that his interest was in building a tax preparation business by developing a base of satisfied customers that received large refunds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).