United States v. David Scruggs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no jurisdictional defect when the language of the charging document \track[ed] the statutory language” even though \the facts proffered at the plea hearing [were] insufficient to establish that” the defendant committed the crime
• affirming denial of claim of ineffective assistance in habeas action because petitioner did not establish “that counsel’s actions affected the voluntariness of his plea”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).