United States v. David Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that challenge to validity of indictment is akin to a collateral attack on conviction
• challenge to the validity of a grand jury indictment, asserted in post-judgment motion seeking grand jury records, “initiated a second collateral attack [under § 2255]”
• considering post-judgment Rule 6(e) motion
• considering post-judgment Rule 6(e) motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).