United States v. David Romo, Jr., Ann Romo, Juanita Romo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the rule “assumes the discovery, after trial, of favorable, material information” (in- ternal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• noting that the defendant No. 07-3692 19 failed to subpoena, interview, or request the production of the witness
• approving a warrant issued based on observation and purchase of cocaine within 72 hours preceding warrant application
• self-serving testimony of defendant insufficient to warrant entrapment instruction where government presents credible evidence of predisposition
• four prior controlled buys and information on two prior occasions leading to drug charges against three individuals
• “Pursuant to the [Sentencing Reform] Act, the sentencing court must select a sentence from within the guideline range.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).