United States v. David R. Knoll

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff had no reasonable expectation of privacy in files stolen from his office before government involvement by burglars who were not acting as agents for the government when they stole the files
• citing, inter alia, United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 732-37 (1993)
• finding no Fourth Amendment violation when police searched defendant’s files, which had been stolen by private actors and searched by the private actors before being given to the police

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).