Skip to main content
· 5/7/2001

United States v. David R. Hawkins

Citations

  • 249 F.3d 867
  • 2001 Daily Journal DAR 4407
  • 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3657
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 8486
  • 2001 WL 474133

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the “burden is on the Government to per- suade the district court that a seizure comes under one of a few specifi- cally established exceptions to the warrant requirement” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • holding that the “burden is on the Government to persuade the district court that a seizure comes under one of a few specifically established exceptions to the warrant requirement” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • holding that the “burden is on the Government to per- suade the district court that a seizure comes under one of a few specifi- cally established exceptions to the warrant requirement” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alarcon, Kozinski, Hawkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.