United States v. David O'Malley & Robert Salerno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that FBI Agent testimony regarding prior statements of witness who recanted at trial was admissible
• stating that FBI Agent testimony regarding prior statements of witness who recanted at trial was admissible
• stating that FBI Agent’s testimony regarding prior statements of witness who recanted was admissible
• “Nothing in this rule prohibits the introduction of out-of-court statements identifying the defendant made by the declarant who at trial... denies that the defendant was ... involved in the crime.”
• interpreting the federal counterpart rule (i.e., Fed.Evid.R. 801(D)(1)(c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).