United States v. David Nicklas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the government is required \to prove a reasonable recipient would have interpreted the defendant's communication as a serious threat to injure\
• holding that the government is required “to prove a reasonable recipient would have interpreted the defendant's communication as a serious threat to injure”
• joining the majority of circuits which have held that, in the wake of Black, § 875(c) does not require the Government to prove a defendant specifically intended his or her statements to be threatening
• adopting Sixth Circuit's reasoning in Jeffries, 692 F.3d at 479-80

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).