United States v. David Miner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant’s general awareness of pending IRS investigations sufficiently meets the nexus element
• differentiating the harmless error standard of review for a constitutional error — an erroneous jury instruction — from a non-constitutional evidentiary error
• applying harmless-error review to the erroneous admission of an expert’s testimony that the defendant had acted intentionally
• finding error harmless when “voluminous evidence was properly admitted at trial indicating” guilt
• “[T]the government should not spoon-feed its theory of the case to the jury through a government agent.” (internal quotation marks, alternations, and citations omitted)
• finding the error to be harmless given the other evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).