United States v. David Meade Bernard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because quantity of drugs irrelevant for charge of simple possession, evidence of weight of substance is improper
• expert testimony not relied upon by jury in arriving at its verdict on an unrelated charge; therefore, issue of admissibility of expert’s testimony on. appeal of conviction on unrelated charge is moot
• sentence within statutory maximum unreviewable unless based on constitutional error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).