Skip to main content
· 9/24/2015

United States v. David McLean

Citations

  • 802 F.3d 1228
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 16918
  • 2015 WL 5607641

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the challenging party bears the burden to show clear error in a district court’s application of its local rules
  • stating we review a district court’s application of its local rules for an abuse of discretion
  • ʺ[B]ased on our circuit precedent, if we were to address this issue, we would determine that the decision to classify assistance as a federal benefit was properly submitted to the jury.ʺ
  • “A district court abuses its discretion when it . . . applies the law in an unreasonable or incorrect manner, follows improper procedures in making a determination, or makes findings of fact that are clearly erroneous.” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marcus, Wilson, Schlesinger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.