Skip to main content
· 7/15/1999

United States v. David Mark Armstrong

Citations

  • 187 F.3d 392
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 15954
  • 1999 WL 498713

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding sufficient evidence of possession where the defendant was alone in his car when contraband was found in places easily accessible to the driver
  • “A person has constructive possession over contraband when he has ownership, dominion, or control over the contraband itself or over the premises or vehicle in which it was concealed.”
  • \[W]e agree with the district court that Scott requires that the exclusionary rule not be extended to federal supervised release revocation proceedings.\
  • “Scott requires that the 3 Case: 19-10647 Date Filed: 01/03/2020 Page: 4 of 5 exclusionary rule not be extended to federal supervised release revocation proceedings.”
  • owner and sole occupant of vehicle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luttig, Michael, Motz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.