United States v. David M. Davila and Robert M. Jacques

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that where the defendants failed to make any preliminary showing of misconduct in the jury’s deliberations in hopes of uncovering an impropriety, the trial judge acted properly in denying the defendants’ motion to interview jurors post-verdict
• U.S. Border Patrol Agents acted under color of law when they sexually assaulted illegal aliens

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).