Skip to main content
· 10/16/1984

United States v. David Loyd, Mark Soukenik, William Hood, Jake Loyd, Robert C. Kilpatrick, and Sidney Bedgood

Citations

  • 743 F.2d 1555
  • 17 Fed. R. Serv. 182
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 17668

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • characterizing a trial court's decision to \call[ ] a recess to allow [a] prosecutor to interview [the witness]\ as a \suspension of the sequestration rule\
  • recognizing, in the context of a prosecution witness, that \[t]he decision whether to [call a recess to] allow a prosecutor to 'work with' a witness is within the discretion of the trial court and will not be reviewed absent an abuse of that discretion\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Godbold, Tjo-Flat, Henderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.