Skip to main content
· 8/25/1989

United States v. David Lane, United States of America v. Bruce Pierce

Citations

  • 883 F.2d 1484
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12610
  • 51 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 39,269

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding Section 245 under Commerce Clause, as applied to religiously motivated killing of talk show host engaged in private employment
  • “When Congress enacts a statute under its commerce power, it is not constitutionally obligated to require proof beyond a reasonable doubt that each individual act in the class of activities regulated had an effect on interstate commerce.”
  • “As a general rule, we presume that juries follow [limiting] instructions.”
  • “If all the evidence in a joint trial of defendants was admitted against each codefendant, no such prejudice could result from the joint trial because the evidence would be precisely as it would at each defendant’s separate trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holloway, Seymour, Baldock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.