United States v. David L. Ries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that standards for admission of pro hac vice attorneys need * not be the same as those seeking permanent admission and that court may reject pro hac vice application where compelling purpose warrants denial
• determining that trial court was within its discretion in denying counsel's pro hac vice application
• observing that a defendant's choice of counsel may be limited to serve a \compelling purpose\ such as \[e]nsuring the ethical and orderly administration of justice\ (quotation omitted)
• “[C]ounsel from other jurisdictions may be significantly more difficult to reach . . . than local counsel.”
• “[C]ounsel from other jurisdictions may be significantly more difficult to reach . . . than local counsel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).