United States v. David Joseph Shedlock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• pounding on a car door and advancing aggressively toward an officer satisfies the force requirement of the statute
• subsequent obstructive acts related to provision of abortion services admissible pursuant to Rule 404(b) in FACE Act prosecution
• “Expert testimony is helpful to a jury if it concerns matters beyond the knowledge of average individuals; however, it cannot supplant the jury’s role in evaluating the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).