Eighth Circuit· 6/13/1991
United States v. David Hodges
Citations
- 936 F.2d 371
- 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 12049
- 1991 WL 100827
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no evidence that the government induced the middleman into helping the government “net the distant defendant”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arnold, Gibson, Loken
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Dwayne A. WashingtonD.C. Circuit· 1997-02-21· cited 108×
- United States v. Arnold L. Hollingsworth, Jr. And William A. Pickard, IIISeventh Circuit· 1994-06-02· cited 95×
- United States v. Jack Pardue and Michel PardueEighth Circuit· 1993-02-16· cited 40×
- United States v. EmmertEighth Circuit· 1993-11-16· cited 36×
- United States v. LuisiFirst Circuit· 2007-04-10· cited 35×
- United States v. Olurotimi Olatunde LayeniD.C. Circuit· 1996-09-12· cited 33×
- United States v. Richard NealEighth Circuit· 1993-03-30· cited 19×
- United States v. KempNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 1995-07-31· cited 2×
- Unnamed caseEighth Circuit· 1994-01-26· cited 1×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.