United States v. David Hirsch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding the district court’s denial of a motion to compel evidence in a selective- prosecution case because the movant failed to “produce at least some credible showing of differential treatment of similarly situated members of other races or protected classes”
• district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to compel discovery in selective prosecution case because defendant failed to produce “at least some credible showing of differential treatment of similarly situated members of other races or a protected class”
• reviewing for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).