United States v. David Hargrove

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Any prejudice from this testimony resulted solely from its tendency to link Hargrove to the [crime] and was not unfair.\
• “Any prejudice from this testimony resulted solely from its 16 No. 04-2793 tendency to link Hargrove to the [crime] and was not unfair.”
• evidence concerning pager, cash, and drug reaction of dog when car was searched was intricately related to conspiracy, even where defendant was arrested 10 months after end of charged conspiracy
• it is not an abuse of discretion to allow testimony by a witness, who has heard prior testimony in violation of a sequestration order, which is offered to rebut, not conform with, the prior testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).