United States v. David Hampton Tedder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that applicable guideline range available to district court post-Booker without need to justify departure from guidelines
• holding in pertinent part that Libretti 10 remains binding Supreme Court precedent with respect to forfeiture and Sixth Amendment
• holding post-Booker that the Sixth Amendment does not apply to forfeitures
• the jury trial right under Fed. R.Crim.P. 32.2 is “limited to the nexus between the funds and the crime; Rule 32.2 does not entitle the accused to a jury’s decision on the amount of the forfeiture.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).