United States v. David H. Archuleta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Nothing in Booker changes the interpretation of McMillan in our post- Apprendi cases.\
• finding harmless error where the district court refused to find the Guidelines unconstitutional but gave the defendant an alternative sentence
• applying \reasonable doubt\ standard, on the assumption that the sentence violated the Sixth Amendment
• “Nothing in Booker changes the interpretation of McMillan in our post- Apprendi cases.”
• “Nothing in Booker changes the interpretation of McMillan in our post-Apprendi cases.”
• reviewing newly raised constitutional argument for plain error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).