· 5/25/2004
United States v. David Gene Lewis
Citations
- 368 F.3d 1102
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 10204
- 2004 WL 1152809
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the Double Jeopardy Clause “prevents prosecutors from sinking a case they knew was doomed to end in an acquittal in the hope of having better luck before a second jury”
- “Barring a retrial for the prosecution’s alleged intentional Brady violations would be an unnecessary expansion of the Double Jeopardy Clause.”
- government's alleged Brady violations at first trial did not establish a double jeopardy bar to retrial
- government's alleged Brady violations at first trial did not establish a double jeopardy bar to retrial
- government's alleged Brady violations at first trial did not establish a double jeopardy bar to retrial
- “Courts . . . can dismiss actions where government attorneys have willfully deceived the court an engaged in conduct utterly inconsistent with the orderly administration of justice.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Callahan, McKEOWN, Wallace
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.