Skip to main content
· 5/25/2004

United States v. David Gene Lewis

Citations

  • 368 F.3d 1102
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 10204
  • 2004 WL 1152809

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the Double Jeopardy Clause “prevents prosecutors from sinking a case they knew was doomed to end in an acquittal in the hope of having better luck before a second jury”
  • “Barring a retrial for the prosecution’s alleged intentional Brady violations would be an unnecessary expansion of the Double Jeopardy Clause.”
  • government's alleged Brady violations at first trial did not establish a double jeopardy bar to retrial
  • government's alleged Brady violations at first trial did not establish a double jeopardy bar to retrial
  • government's alleged Brady violations at first trial did not establish a double jeopardy bar to retrial
  • “Courts . . . can dismiss actions where government attorneys have willfully deceived the court an engaged in conduct utterly inconsistent with the orderly administration of justice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Callahan, McKEOWN, Wallace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.