Skip to main content
· 5/17/1968

United States v. David Galvin

Citations

  • 394 F.2d 228
  • 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6887

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • handwriting testimony is not rendered inadmissible merely “because it 18 expresses a probability”
  • handwriting testimony is not rendered inadmissible merely “because it expresses a probability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kalodner, Ganey, Van Dusen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.