United States v. David Elmer Bloomgren

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that lack of timeliness of a Rule 17(b) application supported the district court’s decision to deny twenty-three of twenty-six requested subpoenas
• affirming denial in part because defendant failed to “reveal with specificity the substance of each of the individual witnesses’ testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).