United States v. David Earle Champion and Claude Vance Cooley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that an indictment worded conjunctively under a statute which uses disjunctive language may be disjunctively consid- ered by the jury and proof on any one of the allegations is sufficient to sustain a conviction
• affirming district court’s response to jury question that the government could charge the defendant in the conjunctive but prove the case at trial in the disjunctive
• pro- viding that an indictment worded conjunctively under a statute which uses disjunctive language may be disjunctively considered by the jury and proof on any one of the allegations is sufficient to sustain a con- viction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).