Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that co-conspirator’s actions were reasonably foreseeable where “the defendants shared a vehicle and an apartment address to further their criminal endeavor”
• noting that counterfeiter’s creation of checks with valid routing numbers but fictitious account numbers alone con- stituted “strong evidence” of a sophisticated scheme under § 2B1.1(b)(9)(C)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).