United States v. David E. Napier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no clear error where the parties submitted conflicting evidence and the district court found the Government’s more reliable
• finding no clear error where the parties submitted conflicting evidence and the district court found the Government's more reliable
• for sentencing guidelines decisions, “[f]actual findings … are simply reviewed for clear error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).